Sequel Book-Chapter 7


 * Note.1: don't forget to check Home page!
 * Note.2: if you detected typos, mistakes in context, or any vagueness/ anything not understable/ anything not clear/any confusion, tell that in comments pls.

Content
"if we assumed that the human mind evolved according to the evolution theory, from minds of animals lower than human..then why this mind evolution didnt produce engineering monkeys and mathmatican cheetahs and biologists dolphins (sarcastically)?after all -as the theory says- all these creatures lived millions of years before humans, so why their minds didnt "evolve" like how their bodies evolved to each other?"

"there is attitude in some organisms called [Altruism], meaning that some creatures sacrifice themselves and their food for the sake of other creatures..for example the Meerkat animal..some individuals in the Meerkat herd delay their meal time to take care of the younger individuals during the whole herd's hunting trips...and like some birds that appoint some individuals in their flocks to scream when they see a hawk..these individuals warn the whole flock of the hawk's presence, and by their standing in the front line of the flock, they have more risk to get eaten by hawks..or like the monkeys that clean each other backs from parasites, or bees that sting you when you approach their cell, sacrifing themselves for the sake of whole cell..or the zebras that stand in front lines, risking themselves to be eaten to protect the youngers...so in all these cases, what happened to the selection mechanism or the competition for survival??"

"the evolutionists explained this attitude by saying that the individual that does that, it does that so the whole herd to survive..but that means that now survival is not for the fittest individual only, but for whole herds..survival of the fittest herd? there is another problem here, that this attitide might happen from certain animals to animals from totally other kind or to even humans..so we find dolphins resucing humans from drowning, and we find a strange relation between shrimps and Goby fish..as the Gobys guard the mini-caverns of shrimps and warn them even from dangers..without any price..does that means that the Goby protects the shrimps just to 'help them survive'..?"

"evolutionists said there are useless areas in the DNA string ..they even said that most of the DNA string is useless..they call these 'useless' areas Junk DNA, but that didnt came because they ALREADY found it useless, but because of a dilemma they found themselves in.Haldane Dilemma. Haldane found out that there are millions of mutations happens while there is limited generations of organisms isnt enough for evolution to effect them despite all these mutations happening.and these limited generation are usually born disease-free and without deformations at same time..so where did these mutations go? Kimura came and suggested that if this assumption was true, then most of DNA areas should be effect-less..with many mutations happening it without the natural selection interfering or choosing anything from them..then Onho came and called these supposed areas Junk DNA...so the idea of useless DNA parts came from a dilemma the evolutionists found themselves in..that they couldnt explain evolution except when they assume that +90% of the DNA string is useless..so it was just a hypothesis that many people believed as a fact"

"Hitler used Eugenics as justification to kill the mentally or physically disabled people including paralysis patients..the most common method to kill them was posionous gases..but many people were against that, so the nazi propaganda strated to work quickly..they released I Accuse film, where a young girl, who have some muscle disease, was saying she just wishes death and how is that the best solutionm.etc..but still, many were against it so hitler officialy abandoned Eugenics to not lose the great support of the people to him..however, it continued but undercover, unofficialy."

"some weird theories appear with evolution fanatics, like those who suggest that dinosaurs turned to birds gradually via the fast running and jumping in forests to catch food....huh like if humans kept running for millions of years they will turn to birds??"

"another example on these extremely weird theories, the theory that suggested that nipples in mammals evolved from sweat glands, as young reptiles were licking the sweat of their parents to moisture themselves, and across millions of years,some sweat glands turned gradually to nipples and sweat turned to milk..the problem that some of the ordinary people still believe things like this and consider it reliable scientific theories!"

"one of the most wonderful eyes is the eyes of Leaf Tailed Gecko, it have holes that widens at night so they can determine colors at the darkness of night..there is also the 4 eyed fish, that have 2 eyes with each eye have 2 pupils, in each eye,one pupil looks up searching for a meal and one looks down to detect any danger"

"the extreme complications in the grandma LUCA is LITERALLY nothing compared to what any organism's body contains from cells that form tissues that form organs that form systems that works and cooperates with each other by a very organized and accurate way so the organism can breath, digest, reproduce, and think..there is a whole branch of science specialized in describing the systems in organisms and theur functions and work methods and its cooperation..a branch called Physiology...the evolutional randomness cannot even approach explaining all these systems and formations that works altogether with total accuracy!"

"Orchid flower disguises as female Hornets, to attract male hornets, so when they come to it, they carry its pollens and when they fly, they spread the pollen in the air..it also might disguise as female flies, so when male flies come to it, they carry its pollen with them and spreads it in the air..this is programmed inside these flowers since beginning..so who taught this to the flower?is it the random evolution?"

"when you think in the existence of chickens, ducks, geese, cows, sheep, birds that dont fly, cattle, rabbits, camels everywhere in the world, and these all are full of meat..you will be sort of mindblown, as it seems that there is one who prepared it by these numbers so they or their products can be a daily food to humans....why they didnt got extinct? or why didnt they evolve to other creatures that is un-edible so they can survive -according to natural selection-?"

"three theories that affected 'the humanity' of humans..Darwin's theory of evolution that tries to prove the animalistic origins of humans, so if human got that in his mind he can accept the second theory after that..theory of Marx..that sees the only aim of human is to fulfill his belly..materialistic needs only..so if he accepted that he can accept the third theory...Freud's theory that suggested all humans actions, deeds, activities, aims..all emerges from the sexual desire"

"How science can judge if a poem or a musical note is good and innovative or bad?how can it judge if an art piece is precious or just color spalshes?science will tell you that lacing someone's drink with poison will kill them..but science will never tell you that poisoning your grandparents to take their inhertiance is wrong..so, science alone is not enough.."

parts that happens in the scientifical hall during the break times that isnt mentioned in main book:

The Cloaked Man with Anarchism mask told The Blessed: Do you know, that if we managed to create life in laboratories, which will happen sooner that you expect, all your beliefs in the god will go with wind?

The Blessed replied calmly: if you even managed to create life in laboratories, that will be actually a stronger proof on existence of God!!

Adam said: "could you explain how?"

The Blessed said: because this life that you created in Laboratory, you created it by a lot effort and using studies and calculations and intllegent scientists and resources abd accurate, previously-prepared circumstances..and you gathered all this in order to make this achievment and create life in labortatory!

Adam said: "Then what?" The Blessed replied: Then they say that this complicated life on earth emerged randomly from nothingness by coincidence without need to an intellegent creator! did you understood?i mean, that in order to create a primitive type of life in laboratory -assuming it happened although it didnt even happen yet- you needed a lot of efforts and intellegent scientists to create it, then how could that universe with all its complications have appeared by coincidence and randomness??" ______ The Cloaked man looked at one scientist who believes Creation and said: "the beauty we see in the nature is not an evidence of God's existence..formation of a beautiful natural scene might happen by coincidence...when it rains, seeds -that fallen by chance on ground- grows up so it turns to trees, grass and flowers, so it attracted butterflies and insects...the formation of this scene wasnt intended!"

the scientist asked: "so in your opinion, from where all this life emerged?"

the cloaked man said: from the material.it emerged from the material.

The scientist said: "so you mean life was lying in the (dead) material?do you know that we were describing spiritualists who talk about material by spiritual characteristics as (too extreme) in spiritualism? we didnt know that you think science says that "life is lying in the dead material"?

the cloaked man said: what spiritual charactaristics? i talk about amino acids. they formed by coincidence then everything formed from it.

The scientist replied: "well, life is not all amino acids..the powder you buy from supermarket contain amino acids..in the end its just a material..it might have been formed by chance or not, i dont care...but iam sure its not the secret of life..amino acids are just one gear in the great motor of life" - quotes from the 3 scientifical chapters that hasnt mentioned nor been said by any character in the main book:

"science can explain some single mechanisms/systems like motion of planets or the attitude of periodic table elements..but for the complex mechanisms, science can not explain them clearly "

"DNA amount that takes the space of a pin's head, have information whose size approximately is 4 billion Gigabyte...how they can explain that?"

"Some extremist creationists explain fossils whose age is + 6000 year old by claiming its from the work of Satan.they say its Satan is the one who put it and gave it these properites...but thats a big mistake..they prefered to assume a way more power and properties for Satan rather than researching and following science"

"who said that God can be measured by the expermintal materalistic terms...which scientist or theologist said that?? so ..could you answer this question: what is Time? we want to see and touch Time..but Time can NOT be searched for among the natural things or natural parts..niether is Space...they arent seen as objects in the nature, but rather a Dimensions...so, God cannot be searched for as object or as a dimension, but as an entity, the First (no one is before him) and the Last (no one is after him), the most High and the most Near..the All-Knower of everything....we cant imagine Him as a natural object..but when we fail we say ok,science failed in that so god dont exist....We even cannot search for Time, then how it is possible to search for the creator of Time?"

"Materialism belittles the human value and importance in existence...and thats one of Satan's goals as result of his 'jealousy' from humans...to convince humans that they have no value"

"when we see a star by our eyes, it could've passed from that place or even exploded since millions of years...so seeing something by eyes is not always an evidence of this thing's existence"

"Kant was saying that he believes God's existence using just morality evidences..he says that there must be an Afterlife, Life is not ideal for achieving justice...there should be something other than life where justice is achieved"

"Wireless waves are example on the thing that exists everywhere..under the sea, in the mines, in the mountains..etc, because it is too fast, it can be actually everywhere"

"many people oftenly mix between religious constants that is un-discussionable, and the efforts theologists made to explain the sacred religious texts..the latter are just human efforts that can be true or can be wrong..for example the earth's shape matter, that explainations had different opinions in them..it is not a religous constant so any opinion/explaination said in it can be doubted in"

"Sacrifices in Islam.. there a verse in the quran that says 《Its neither their meat nor their blood that reaches Allah, but its piety from you that reaches him..》 ..unlike some jewish imgainations that imagines God enjoying the smell of barbecue.. by the way, the same chapter in the Quran ,that had the verse above, cntained other 2 verses, where God mentioned that the aim of these sacrifices is to feed the poor and the needy. as when someone sacrifices an animal, they should ditribute meat to the poor"

"The people's viewpoint towards priests as 《mediums》 between God and the people, is existing since ancient time..and when Akhenaton tried tp challenge the priests authority, they assassinated him and put Tutankhamon instead of him, (who was young so they convinced him to return their authority)..in the end, there shoud be no mediums (considered by people, like priests who have "authority of forgiveness" for example) between God and the people. "

"Descartes is considered the father of modern philosophy, and his ideas was a basis for many ideas that came after him..he was saying we can deduce God's existence by many evidences, such the perfection evidence..as creatures, whatever perfection it reached, is still imperfect..and the creator is always perfect..the perfect attributes we know about god cannot have been emerged from human thoughts..because human is imperfect, and the imperfect cannot be the reason of existence of the absolute perfection idea..we are searching for the reason and the origins of the idea of the god/the creator in humans..and as the idea is about absolute perfection, then it shouldve had a perfect origin..which cannot be a thing less perfect than god"

"if triangles could talk they could've imagined God as trianglural.and if circles could talk they could've imagined god as circular...and this how humans think..they imagine god in sort of humanish form..every creature (if other creatures could talk) couldve imagined god according to its own measures and traits..but god is different than all this, higher than all this, a way more perfect than all this"

"Anthony Flew was the one who led atheism across approximately 50 years abd wrote almost 30 books regarding this topic..then in the end he admitted exietence of god, and that was a big shock to the system for atheists..as the one who drew their way and map, now destroyed all pretexts and justifications he present earlier"

"the original and the common across whole history is people's belief in a deity/a god ..except few cases in each era..now, they (some atheists) say that belief in a deity/a god (whatever it is, a true or a false, one or multiple gods) is a thing from the past because people were ignorant which led them into believing in a mythical figure called a god..but thats not accurate, as the ancient civilisations were civilised and had science and even hidden tech, so they were not ignorant...ok what about modern ages, the age of information and developments? the majority of earth's habitants believe in god/gods... will they say all these are ignorants? then what about the millions scientists in all fields who are christians, muslims, buddhists, hindus ...etc ?"

"Most of the ones who keep themselves extremely attached to atheism, are doing that not because of how strong their scientifical evidences are. rather, they are doing that because of their against-religion viewpoint"

"most of atheist scientists are atheists even before their entry to science..its not science that led them to atheism."

"there no scientific evidence on existence of god...and also there is no scientific evidence on non-existence of god..because science work ONLY on expermintal sensible cases...rather, all evidences on god existence or not is originally based on deductive or philosophical evidences..here philosophy must be involved with science"

"many of atheists are atheists because of hard times or tragedies they passed through in their life so they are sort of hating god for it..or because of their hate to certain religious figures/individuals"

"questions that are presented first by a wrong way, will never find answers and will keep being presented wrongly"

"all conflicts and clashes in the world is result of multiple sorts of imperfection feelings inside humans..and religion is one of the (curtains) they hide under to justify their deeds.so if there were no religion, same conflicts, same clashes, same violence would have happened, and humans could have found many other (curtains) to hide under and justify too"

"there is some nonsense spreading claiming that most of scientists are atheists..the truth is that most of them believed in a creator.such as Galilio, Pascal, Newton, Mendel, Faraday, Boyle, Pasteur..etc..also most of noble laureates scientists were believing in a creator too such as Planck, Heisenberg, Schrodinger..etc"

"multiple scientists said things like..few of the science will make you atheist, but a deep dive in it will make you believe"

"atheists say about things they dont know that 《science hadnt reached that yet》..in fact thats valid religiously, yeah science didnt reach that..quran says 《..And of knowledge, you (humankind) have been given only a little..》 .. if we have more knowledge, we will understand many of the vague things"

"einstein says: if the human mind cannot percept the universe, how could it percept the creator of the universe?"

"lets enjoy life without hatred and fights and debates about what will happen after death and what is existence and from where we came and where we will go...and we forgot totally we are still alive..yet trying to solve after-death problems instead of trying to solve our fucking existing problems in life.."

"You cannot kill IDEAS. ideas live and live forever. all the ones who got burned, imprisoned...etc etc, their ideas got out victorious and spreaded more..if you are confident in your ideas and their truenes, then do not fight ideas of the others (by force or by violence..etc), all those who do that, they do that for authority..they want 'religious authority' for themselves only, in the end,those are just weak scoundrels..ideas are faced and fought with only ideas, not with violence"

"a thing that serves a book most is to prohibit it...when you prohibit something, thats very enough to provoke people curiousity to go after it..this prohibition will make people feel that this book is great and invincible..even if its full of wrongs and nonsense....do not give chance to follish shit to appear as powerful and invincible..so even if idea is wrong or shit, it should be fought with the truth, not with force and violence, as that will only result in this wrong being just more popular"